Currently trying to market myself to ensure I still have a job in the coming months - not easy when I've only been in my current role for a couple of months. But worst case scenarios are not currently as bad as they could be if I worked elsewhere, so am not too concerned at this juncture. Will, of course, keep you as posted on developments as discretion and local disciplinary policy allow.
The long weekend entailed rather a lot of heavy lifting, as I assisted two different couples move flat. There's something really nice about moving in spring, with the whole new beginnings thing and the freshness in the air & sun in the sky. It had the added advantage of giving my underused upper body a bit of a workout - no doubt when I'm preening in my Speedos on a Sicilian beach in July, I will give a metaphorical sleazy wink to the memory of lugging a sodden mattress across the dump car park on Saturday. All for you baby.
In other news, you'll no doubt be relieved to hear I've managed to narrow the Sat Nav choice down to the final few competitors. Excitement is reaching fever pitch, as I weigh up the relative merits of an extra 0.8" of screen or the inclusion of European maps. I need to stop writing sentences like that, it must be so frustrating to read for those of you who don't have the opportunity of regular trips down the pub with me for equally 'gold' chat.
First Name | Sex/ Age | City | State | Overall Place | Gender Place | Age Place | Finish Time | Pace/ Mile | AG Time | AG Gender Place | AG % |
GAV | M31 | NEW YORK | NY | 2725 | 2115 | 442 | 52:01 | 8:23 | 51:46 | 2571 | 51.8 % |
Went out running again tonight - keeping up my impressive once a week routine. I've been spurred back into 'action' by the news that Gav from New York has come perilously close to usurping my personal best (51:12), completing a rain, haggis and cullen skink-lashed route round NYC in aid of the Scottish Tourist Board on Saturday. He's obviously been training hard, and powered his little legs around in a highly creditable 51:46 minutes (good effort my man) - reckoning that with a bit more practice he'll go sub-50. I can't possibly let him beat me to that, as the young upstart only started running about 6 months ago, so I strapped on the plimsolls again this evening and pounded the mean streets of Clapham - the sounds of Fatboy Slim willing me home, if only so I could turn the bloody shite off.
Started off well, before flagging badly towards the end of my epic 3.5k trek - not exactly 48 minute 10km form but definitely an improvement on the smoked tattie of yore, with the added bonus that I passed the 125km mark as measured by my wildly inaccurate Nikeplus gizmo. They seem awfully impressed - didn't have the heart to tell them I'd run at least that far before buying the bloody thing. Just need to find myself some sort of competition to enter now, that doesn't fall on a Sunday or Bank Holiday. Whilst I am 100% committed to my athletics career, I'm buggered if I'm spending another weekend of the booze for the sake of demonstrating my not considerable talents.
In the interests of accuracy I feel it's only fair to point out that my finish time was 52.01. 51.46 was my "Age Graded Time" - "Net finish time adjusted to that of an open division participant using a factor for age and gender. Thus, older participants' times are adjusted downward and open division participants' times remain the same. This, in effect, puts all participants on a level playing field, regardless of age." Whatever that means.
ReplyDeleteChrist, so we're over the hill now to the point where the youngsters have to give us a head start? How utterly depressing.
ReplyDeleteStill - bloody good effort all the same. You're only 50 seconds of my PB, which if we're looking at height-graded-times, would put you about 15 minutes ahead. Sorry, I try not to make some sort of childish jibe but can't help it. Feel free to highlight the windsock-style aerodynamics of my enlarged nostrils.
aargh! I hate writing 'of' when I mean 'off'. Things like that are happening all the time now. I might need to start using age graded spelling.
ReplyDelete